tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post2407605331293050480..comments2024-03-18T17:28:44.693-07:00Comments on Rondam Ramblings: This is what a precious snowflake looks likeRonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11752242624438232184noreply@blogger.comBlogger18125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-35856534976438289032018-10-08T00:44:56.792-07:002018-10-08T00:44:56.792-07:00I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and ...<b>I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker</b><br /><br /><i>>If you don't see the difference between Jesus and Brett Kavanaugh then you are beyond my ability to help.</i><br /><br />What, Rondam Ramblings is now a <b>therapy</b> platform? Just what kind of therapist are you?<br /><br />You're familiar with metaphors, and that some people consider Jesus a role model Publiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00647613579979908182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-35274162031061029462018-10-07T15:46:57.380-07:002018-10-07T15:46:57.380-07:00@Publius:
> Jesus
If you don't see the di...@Publius:<br /><br />> Jesus<br /><br />If you don't see the difference between Jesus and Brett Kavanaugh then you are beyond my ability to help.<br />Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11752242624438232184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-14202090852051813292018-10-07T05:22:44.142-07:002018-10-07T05:22:44.142-07:00Ye have made it a den of thieves
>"Judge ...<b>Ye have made it a den of thieves</b><br /><br /><i>>"Judge Kavanaugh is much shrewder. His calm judicial demeanor..."<br /><br />I couldn't read any further because I was laughing too hard.</i><br /><br />Perhaps you should focus on <b>shrewd.</b><br /><br />During the initial hearings, he displayed his calm judicial demeanor.<br /><br />Here is a painting of Jesus <a href="Publiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00647613579979908182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-70761673918207672552018-10-07T03:14:13.061-07:002018-10-07T03:14:13.061-07:00> > On your theory, C.B.F. committed perjury...> > On your theory, C.B.F. committed perjury. Why? To what end?<br /><br />> Chuck Schumer<br /><br />You do understand that C.B.F. stands for Christine Blasey Ford and not Chuck Schumer, yes?<br /><br />> attempted borking<br /><br />I actually went and read that article. Towards the end it says:<br /><br />"Judge Kavanaugh is much shrewder. His calm judicial demeanor..."<Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11752242624438232184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-34534638656166605892018-10-07T01:44:19.807-07:002018-10-07T01:44:19.807-07:00Demonrat Dirty Tricks
> I'm not aware of a...<b>Demonrat Dirty Tricks</b><br /><br />> I'm not aware of any ad-hominem that I've directed at you.<br /><br /><i>>I'm not surprised. I don't think you'd recognize an ad hominem coming out of your own mouth if it turned around and bit you in the ass.</i><br /><br />>"This is just one example of Ron's intellectual laziness over the past several months."<Publiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00647613579979908182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-31126454236494301822018-10-06T05:21:28.745-07:002018-10-06T05:21:28.745-07:00> I'm not aware of any ad-hominem that I...> I'm not aware of any ad-hominem that I've directed at you.<br /><br />I'm not surprised. I don't think you'd recognize an ad hominem coming out of your own mouth if it turned around and bit you in the ass.<br /><br />"This is just one example of Ron's intellectual laziness over the past several months."<br /><br />> No corroboration by any named Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11752242624438232184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-39461143334973159262018-10-05T23:40:12.273-07:002018-10-05T23:40:12.273-07:00Does Ron support Cat Juggling?
>> all boys ...<b>Does Ron support Cat Juggling?</b><br /><br />>> all boys attempt to rape women in high school and why would Kavanaugh be any different.<br /><br /><i>>Not my position but that of a Republican woman, and one which I have not seen a lot of Republicans rushing to disown.</i><br /><br />That's just you engaging in demagoguery again. An argument of the form "So-and-so hasn't Publiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00647613579979908182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-17933552705946081912018-10-02T18:49:07.250-07:002018-10-02T18:49:07.250-07:00@Peter: It's not *just* Roe. I think they thi...@Peter: It's not *just* Roe. I think they think Kavanaugh will be a reliable vote for corporations, against workers, against gay rights, and for the President (as long as he's a Republican).<br /><br />And I think they're probably right about all of that.<br />Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11752242624438232184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-25623481541484318562018-10-02T18:00:26.973-07:002018-10-02T18:00:26.973-07:00@Ron:
I think it's pretty clear that Republica...@Ron:<br /><i>I think it's pretty clear that Republicans are supporting Kavanaugh precisely because of his actual views, and in particular, because they think (correctly IMHO) that he's going to vote to overturn Roe.</i><br /><br />Well, to me, supporting a nominee because of his expected vote on one litmus test issue is not suppporting him because of his actual views, taken as a whole. Peter Donishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09122769947782402203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-86453091284311568462018-10-02T05:55:19.287-07:002018-10-02T05:55:19.287-07:00@Peter: Actually, I think it's pretty clear th...@Peter: Actually, I think it's pretty clear that Republicans are supporting Kavanaugh precisely because of his actual views, and in particular, because they think (correctly IMHO) that he's going to vote to overturn Roe. Lower courts are already starting to uphold increasingly restrictive abortion laws in anticipation.Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11752242624438232184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-25720173075001470322018-10-01T20:22:05.937-07:002018-10-01T20:22:05.937-07:00@Don:
The vast majority of the Senators have alrea...@Don:<br /><i>The vast majority of the Senators have already made up their minds</i><br /><br />Yes, I know. But...<br /><br /><i>Your concern, about "actual views", has already been taken into account, and resolved by the ~95 Senators</i><br /><br />...I don't think those ~95 Senators made up their minds based on anything related to Kavanaugh's actual views. I think they did soPeter Donishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09122769947782402203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-42528077203270934662018-10-01T18:54:04.150-07:002018-10-01T18:54:04.150-07:00@Peter: "as if there couldn't be any othe...@Peter: "<i>as if there couldn't be any other possible reason for not confirming him.</i>"<br /><br />But there is not "any other possible reason" which would appeal to a majority of the US Senators. In so far as Kavanaugh is biased about his politics or the law, he is biased in the direction that a majority of the Senators approve of.<br /><br />The vast majority of the Don Geddishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04214642122689048677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-64357685463101112372018-10-01T17:13:23.329-07:002018-10-01T17:13:23.329-07:00@Ron:
If you really wanted to clear your name, you...@Ron:<br /><i>If you really wanted to clear your name, you should have done it by calling for an FBI investigation</i><br /><br />I agree with everything you say in the post except this particular statement. It is not Kavanaugh's job to call for an FBI investigation (or any other investigation) of allegations against him. It's the Senate's job to call for whatever investigation they Peter Donishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09122769947782402203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-77316696352888673632018-09-30T05:59:53.795-07:002018-09-30T05:59:53.795-07:00> all boys attempt to rape women in high school...> all boys attempt to rape women in high school and why would Kavanaugh be any different.<br /><br />Not my position but that of a Republican woman, and one which I have not seen a lot of Republicans rushing to disown.<br /><br />> But what does Ron come back with? A troll<br /><br />And what does Publius come back with? An ad-hominem.<br /><br />> the logical fallacy<br /><br />Pot. Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11752242624438232184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-6543898052370060022018-09-29T23:23:06.849-07:002018-09-29T23:23:06.849-07:00Kavanaugh: never been daunted
@Luke:
[Publius]
&...<b>Kavanaugh: never been daunted</b> <br /><br />@Luke:<br />[Publius]<br />>> Credible, no. Not even close to being credible.<br /><br />[Ron]<br /><i>>Why not? Even Republican women say that <a href="https://goo.gl/jnYtvL" rel="nofollow">all boys attempt to rape women in high school.</a> Why would Kavanaugh be any different?</i><br /><br />Luke, here is an example of Ron trolling his Publiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00647613579979908182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-36975465465100183302018-09-29T08:42:29.595-07:002018-09-29T08:42:29.595-07:00"The FBI is not used to investigate any quest..."<i>The FBI is not used to investigate any questions around judicial nominees. [...] What of all those Senators asking for an FBI investigation? Dumbasses, every one of them.</i>"<br /><br />And yet, strangely, this seems not at all limited to "<i>Demonrats, antifa, all the protesters, and other far-left loonies</i>" as you claimed. Instead, GOP Senators have <i>also</i> Don Geddishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04214642122689048677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-51912502508181511632018-09-29T07:01:32.551-07:002018-09-29T07:01:32.551-07:00> Credible, no. Not even close to being credibl...> Credible, no. Not even close to being credible.<br /><br />Why not? Even Republican women say that <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/407927-gop-women-issue-strong-defense-of-kavanaugh" rel="nofollow">all boys attempt to rape women in high school</a>. Why would Kavanaugh be any different?<br />Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11752242624438232184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592542.post-75397935039265758812018-09-28T23:07:05.627-07:002018-09-28T23:07:05.627-07:00Logical Fallacy Season at Rondam Ramblings
It'...<b>Logical Fallacy Season at Rondam Ramblings</b><br /><br />It's almost October, so we're getting close to Logical Fallacy Season.<br /><br />Ron kicked it off early with a giant broadside of <a href="https://goo.gl/MDlMRM" rel="nofollow">Relative Privation,</a> also known as <a href="https://goo.gl/aXDkwD" rel="nofollow">It Could Be Worse Fallacy</a>. Is it because it gives you reason Publiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00647613579979908182noreply@blogger.com